<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Company Names of Naming Companies Name Taxonomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/</link>
	<description>The naming and branding blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Weller</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>On a scale of 1-10, the Igor name is WHALE POOP, the deepest organic substance found on Planet Earth, far below the pedestrian POND SCUM of most naming company names. If it were as great as you are desperately trying to convince the world it is, we&#039;d hear a veritable thunderous detonation of corporate America&#039;s marketing fiends slapping their foreheads in frustration and envy. The silence is deafening. It&#039;s a joke, short-lived, and not very funny. Terminally cute, if you will. Have a nice day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a scale of 1-10, the Igor name is WHALE POOP, the deepest organic substance found on Planet Earth, far below the pedestrian POND SCUM of most naming company names. If it were as great as you are desperately trying to convince the world it is, we&#8217;d hear a veritable thunderous detonation of corporate America&#8217;s marketing fiends slapping their foreheads in frustration and envy. The silence is deafening. It&#8217;s a joke, short-lived, and not very funny. Terminally cute, if you will. Have a nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igor</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/comment-page-1/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>Choosing a name based on the availibility of the dot com is the biggest naming blunder of all. It should never be a consideration. Ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing a name based on the availibility of the dot com is the biggest naming blunder of all. It should never be a consideration. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brand Shark</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Brand Shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2007/07/the-company-names-of-naming-companies-name-taxonomy/#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>What about a naming company like Igor who doesn&#039;t even own their dot com URL.  That&#039;s an even greater marketing blunder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a naming company like Igor who doesn&#8217;t even own their dot com URL.  That&#8217;s an even greater marketing blunder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

