<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good naming news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/</link>
	<description>The naming and branding blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: igor</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Tony the Tiger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Tony the Tiger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kixo</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Kixo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2006/02/good-naming-news-2/#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>I agree, Accomplice is a great name for this type of company. It also works for three more reasons:

- it&#039;s an alliteration of &quot;accomplish&quot; - which is the objective of using TM/PM software

- it has hard &quot;k&quot; and soft &quot;c&quot; sounds, which I think people like in brand names

- Accomplice (like Amazon) is a generic enough name that it can still be used if the company expands into broader products or markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Accomplice is a great name for this type of company. It also works for three more reasons:</p>
<p>- it&#8217;s an alliteration of &#8220;accomplish&#8221; &#8211; which is the objective of using TM/PM software</p>
<p>- it has hard &#8220;k&#8221; and soft &#8220;c&#8221; sounds, which I think people like in brand names</p>
<p>- Accomplice (like Amazon) is a generic enough name that it can still be used if the company expands into broader products or markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

