<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creative agencies choosing creative names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snarkhunting.com/2005/05/creative-agencies-choosing-creative-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2005/05/creative-agencies-choosing-creative-names/</link>
	<description>The naming and branding blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.snarkhunting.com/2005/05/creative-agencies-choosing-creative-names/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snarkhunting.com/2005/05/creative-agencies-choosing-creative-names/#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>Yes. It&#039;s ironic that these communication experts end up with such hard to write, hard to say, hard to remember company monikers.

They are an alphabetical trail of ugly company history. Yet totally meaningless.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. It&#8217;s ironic that these communication experts end up with such hard to write, hard to say, hard to remember company monikers.</p>
<p>They are an alphabetical trail of ugly company history. Yet totally meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

